In an over-informationed world we are under-literate.

Literacy is like a tomato. Do you say “tomaeto” or “tomahto”? Just as either says tomato, the concept of literacy has different definitions for the same word. Some of these definitions technically apply yet are not adequate measures of what it means to be literate in today’s parlance. So, what is the big deal about literacy? Is being literate critical to adult life? Given how much information adults are exposed to every day, can we expect adults with varying levels of literacy skills to effectively consider and understand the constant barrage of information? The answer is “no,” yet our world ultimately spins on the voices and decisions of under-literate adults.

Literacy is a status.

Literacy historically is a status based upon measures of reading and writing. As a statistic, “High literacy rates have been found to correlate to everything from access to economic opportunity, to better nutrition, to environmental sustainability.” We generalize that citizens of economically advantaged nations have high literacy rates and citizens of underdeveloped nations have low literacy rates. A nation boasted its high literacy rate as a cause-and-effect proposition. “Our people enjoy a better standard of living because they are literate.”

https://ncte.org/blog/2020/03/literacy-just-reading-writing

What should we know about this status?

Using the percentage of the population 15 years and older who can read and write as a measure of literacy, Andorra, Finland, Greenland, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Norway, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, and North Korea tie for #1 with 100% of their citizens being literate. North Korea? If a dictator says everyone can read, everyone is literate. The United States is in a large group of nations ranking #2 with 99% of the population rated as literate. Sounds good, but is it?

https://www.uscareerinstitute.edu/blog/which-countries-have-the-highest-and-lowest-literacy-rates

These data raise questions as to how we decide an adult is literate at the international level. This is how the data are gathered.

“The breakdown of strategies for deciding literacy covers four categories:

  • self-reported literacy declared directly by individuals,
  • self-reported literacy declared by the head of the household,
  • tested literacy from proficiency examinations, and
  • indirect estimation or extrapolation.

In most cases, the categories covering ‘self-reports’ correspond to estimates of literacy that rely on answers provided to a simple yes/no question asking people if they can read and write. The category ‘indirect estimation’ corresponds mainly to estimates that rely on indirect evidence from educational attainment, usually based on the highest degree of completed education.”

https://ourworldindata.org/how-is-literacy-measured

Based on self-reported data collection, many adults in the world consider themselves to be literate. But are they? Literacy is more than a statistical number.

Literacy is a functional tool.

Literacy is a tool. “… literacy is the way that we interact with the world around us, how we shape it and are shaped by it. It is how we communicate with others via reading and writing, but also by speaking, listening, and creating. It is how we articulate our experience in the world and declare, ‘We Are Here!’”

https://ncte.org/blog/2020/03/literacy-just-reading-writing

This consideration of literacy, that is how we communicate and receive communication from others and how we create communicative information, opens new concepts of what it means to be literate. “According to a study by the University of California – San Diego, the average American consumes about 34 gigabytes of data and information every day. This volume is equivalent of around 100,000 words heard or read daily.”

In our age of digital and virtual information, adults are bombarded by and likewise spew volumes of information daily. A literate adult must be skillful and competent on both sides of receiving and sending literacy.

Interestingly the Cambridge Dictionary points to both definitions – status and tool. Cambridge defines literacy as “the ability to read and write.” And literacy is the “knowledge of a particular subject, or a particular type of knowledge. Computer literacy is becoming as essential as the ability to drive a car.”

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/literacy

UNESCO reinforces literacy as an essential tool. “Literacy is a means of identification, understanding, interpretation, creation, and communication in an increasingly digital, text-mediated, information-rich, and fast-changing world. On the historical international scene, literacy is a statistic of the population who can read and write. Literacy also is a broad array of functional skills that are applied in a successful adult life. For others, literacy is the ability to access and understand information in multiple contexts.”

https://ncte.org/blog/2020/03/literacy-just-reading-writing

This other “tomato” version of literacy opens the realm of higher order skills that are necessary for understanding, interpreting, analyzing, and evaluating information that is read and heard. And then doing something with or because of what one has read and heard. Literacy is making meaning of and considering what to do with information.

Able to read. At what level of reading?

Self-reporting is not an adequate measure of how we use literacy as a tool. “The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) defines literacy across six levels. People with Level 1 or below literacy skills are considered to have very poor literacy skills, while Level 3 is considered the minimum literacy skills required for coping with everyday life.

  • Below Level 1: Adults can read brief texts on familiar topics and locate a single piece of specific information. Only basic vocabulary knowledge is required, and adults are not required to understand the structure of sentences of paragraphs.
  • Level 1: Adults can read relatively short digital or print texts to locate a single piece of information that is identical to or synonymous with the information given in the question. Knowledge and skill in recognizing basic vocabulary, determining the meaning of sentence, and reading short paragraphs of text is expected.
  • Level 2: Adults can make matches between the text, either digital or printed, and information. Adults can paraphrase or make low-level inferences.
  • Level 3: Adults are required to read and navigate dense, lengthy or complex texts.
  • Level 4: Adults can integrate, interpret or synthesize information from complex or lengthy texts. Adults can identify and understand one or more specific, non-central idea(s) in the text in order to interpret or evaluate subtle evidence-claim or persuasive discourse relationships.
  • Level 5: Adults can search for and integrate information across multiple, dense texts; construct syntheses of similar and contrasting ideas or points of view; or evaluate evidence-based arguments. Adults understand subtle, rhetorical cues and can make high-level inferences or use specialized background knowledge.”

As a literacy tool, how well do we read?

We get a different portrait of literacy in the United States when we use the OECD’s evidence-based data. Remember that the U.S. claims a 99% literacy status using self-reporting and other non-scientific methods.

“The most recent national survey on adult literacy is from 2012-2017, conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics as part of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC). The U.S. ranks 16th among the 33 OECD nations included in this study.

Nationally, over 1 in 5 adults (in the United States) have a literacy proficiency at or below Level 1. Adults in this range have difficulty using or understanding print materials. Those on the higher end of this category can perform simple tasks based on the information they read, but adults below Level 1 may only understand very basic vocabulary or be functionally illiterate.

On the upside, “46% of adults in the U.S. have a literacy proficiency at or above level 3. Adults at Levels 3, 4, and 5 have varying degrees of proficiency in understanding, interpreting and synthesizing information from multiple, complex texts to infer meaning and draw conclusions.”

https://www.apmresearchlab.org/10x-adult-literacy

Huh!

Approximately half of the adults in the U.S. have functional literacy tools that are “considered the minimum literacy skills required for coping with everyday life.” The other half of that statistic have less that minimal literacy skills.

The application of literacy as a functional tool is not just eye-opening for the United States. Using the OECD study, 14.9% (or 1 in 7) adults in England have literacy levels below Level 3, which is the equivalent to the literacy skills expected of a nine to 11-year-old.”

https://literacytrust.org.uk/parents-and-families/adult-literacy/what-do-adult-literacy-levels-mean/#:~:text=People%20with%20Level%201%20or,for%20coping%20with%20everyday%20life.

These conclusions are supported by other studies. A Gallup analysis of literacy information gathered by the US Department of Education reports that “About 130 million adults in the U.S., roughly half of Americans between 16 and 74 – have low literacy skills. In this study, literacy is broadly defined as the ability to read and write, but more accurately encompasses the comprehension, evaluation and utilization of information, which is why people describe different types of literacy – such as health, financial, and legal. Low literacy skills can profoundly affect the day-to-day success of adults in the real world, and these impacts extent to their families, too.”

https://www.apmresearchlab.org/10x-adult-literacy

Literacy and public education.

Reading achievement has become the annual dip stick for measuring educational effectiveness in the U.S. since No Child Left Behind became national policy in 2002. State, school district, and school report cards annually publicize the percentage of students who meet the state’s performance expectations in reading. In a nation that self-reports its adults to be literate, children in school struggle with reading.

The Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction reported, “For 2023-24, assessment results show public school student proficiency rates in ELA were at 48%. Students participating in the state’s Private School Choice Programs had a proficiency rate of 30.9 percent. Assessment results show proficiency gaps among different student subgroups continue to exist.”

https://dpi.wi.gov/news/releases/2024/student-assessment-results-forward

It is worthwhile to note that “meeting expectations” on a statewide reading or ELA assessment is not a high standard. State “expectations” are minimal levels of reading ability, very much like Level 2 on the OECD literacy assessment. The number of children meeting “expectations” is nothing to really cheer about. They met a low bar.

In truth, every graduation class fits into the OECD and Gallup estimation of adult literacy in the U.S. – about half of the graduates and young adults in our country meet minimal literacy standards.

When we apply literacy as a status to high school graduates, our society annually receives semi-literate young adults into our communities and general employment. As a result of education, more than half of our adult citizenry can only minimally read and write.

When we apply the second definition, we realize that the hierarchy of our layered economic society does not require every adult to be highly literate. Many high school graduates lack the ability to fully read and listen to complex and technical information and then translate it into their daily lives and jobs fulfill society’s economic needs. They are employed and pay taxes. Their earnings circulate in our consumer-based economy. They are law abiding and live socially in our cities, towns, and countryside. The majority do not need more than a high school diploma plus technical or on-the-job training to live in the United States.

“In 2021, the highest level of education of the population age 25 and older in the United States was distributed as follows: 

  • 8.9% had less than a high school diploma or equivalent.
  • 27.9% had high school graduate as their highest level of school completed. 
  • 14.9% had completed some college but not a degree.
  • 10.5% had an associate degree as their highest level of school completed.
  • 23.5% had a bachelor’s degree as their highest degree.
  • 14.4% had completed an advanced degree such as a master’s degree, professional degree or doctoral degree. 

https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2022/educational-attainment.html

Incomplete literacy can lead to incomplete understanding.

The ability to read, understand, and evaluate information has become more essential as the volume of daily information has increased. When a person hears or reads almost 100,000 words daily, a person must either try to process all that information or begin to categorize and ignore selected types and sources of information. My best bet is the latter. People become increasingly selective in the media they listen to and the text they read, ignoring sources that do not agree with their personal points of view. As they scan text and skim media, they disregard sources they do not agree with and pay attention only to sources agreeable to their perspectives. The loss of a 360-degree listening and reading narrows their understanding to the range of information they choose to hear and read.

Let’s do the arithmetic. In Wisconsin, less than half of our students meet minimal expectations on statewide reading assessments. With their high school and associate degrees, they elect to hear and read only words that express their points of view about our state and world. If this is true, then we need to add a third tomato – incomplete literacy. Given that literacy is a tool, when the tool or reading and listening is applied only to what we want to read and hear, then we have achieved incomplete literacy.

We always do get what we settle for.

Our national and state Founding Fathers valued education. Because they believed a literate populace would be better able to take part in our democratic form of government, they supported public education. The ability to read was essential for voters to make informed choices of leadership and the policies their leaders would execute. As a nation of immigrants, literacy in the English language has always been a pathway to citizenship.

With all that purpose and history, today we have achieved a nation that is minimally and incompletely literate and this is considered good enough for our economic and political welfare.

In a world that is over-informationed, we are under-literate. As educators, we have work to do!

We Are Born To Hear; We Must Be Taught To Listen

“Are you hearing me?”.  Right question.  Humans begin hearing sounds, including human voices, in the womb.  Unless impaired, hearing, like seeing, is an innate characteristic of humans.  We are made to hear the noise that surrounds us every day. 

“Are you listening to me?”.  Another right question.  Listening is an acquired skill that the person you are speaking to may not have mastered.  Given the noise a person hears in their immediacy, it is an assumption that you are being listened to.  There is a huge difference between hearing and listening.

“Are you actively listening to me?”.  A better question.  But, “maybe not” is a very common answer.

As educators, the issue we face is how to teach hearers to become listeners and listeners to become active listeners.  If we believe in natural learning, we can allow a hearing child to wander through life in the belief that experience creates listening skills.  The skills of listening are in her and just need time and place to become effective everyday tools.  That may happen, but many adults today demonstrate untrained listening characteristics.  They hear.  They recognize the source or speaker.  They may acknowledge the topic of the speaker.  Then, they fade into being untrained listeners.  Their focus wanders, they insert own ideas, they start to create a rebuttal before the speaker has finished, and their thinking pursues unrelated tangents.  Some of the unschooled just shut down when they are asked to listen because they don’t know how. 

Listening is an acquired skill we need to teach to children.

What is listening?

“Listening begins by hearing a speaker producing the sound to be listened to.  Hearing is a physiological phenomenon; listening is a psychological act.  People are always hearing, most of the time subconsciously.  Listening is done by choice.  It is the interpretative action taken by someone in order to understand, and potentially make sense of, something one hears”.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Listening

Why should we listen instead just hearing?

Listening and seeing are the primary ways people gather information.  This is one of the reasons Helen Keller’s stories is so meaningful.  She was deaf and blind.  She did not hear or see and was unable to learn from these two essential senses.  With instruction, her brain learned to associate meaning through touch and smell and associate Braille dots with letters and words.  She truly was taught to “listen” to non-sounds.  Almost all of us take our hearing and seeing for granted.  However, without learning how to listen and to discern listening from hearing, we also are disabled in our ability to learn from our sense of hearing.

There are other good reasons to become good listeners.

  • Good listeners are more likable. Individuals with strong listening skills are present in the conversation. People who listen with focus are often perceived as more likable.
  • Good listeners build stronger relationships. Communication is not a one-way street. Good listeners show interest, ask open-ended questions, and acknowledge what’s being said. This helps reduce misunderstandings and builds stronger relationships.
  • Good listeners have a clearer understanding of the topics being discussed. Individuals with refined listening skills seek to fully understand a speaker’s message. They pay attention to both verbal and nonverbal cues and ask for clarification when needed.

https://online.maryville.edu/blog/types-of-listening/

What do we know?

Parents are a child’s first teachers of listening skills.  With their first “Say ‘Mama/Dada”, parents teach an infant to associate sounds and words with a desired meaning.  A parent says a word and coos to give it meaning, or holds up a toy and names it, or points to food on a spoon and names it.  They speak “baby talk” or “parentese” to encourage their baby to make a desired association.  Most parents do not have training in this; they are not taught how to teach their child to listen.  They do what they remember being done for them, or what family members tell them to do.  Others talk with their young parent peers.  In general, infants from birth to pre-school or instructional daycare are subjected to several years of popular wisdom-informed parenting.

The Science of Early Learning provides 22 techniques for parents to try in their efforts to move their baby from hearers of sounds to a baby who is building skills as a listener.  A search of the literature, including the tenth edition of Dr. Spock’s Baby and Child Care, provides a plethora of resources for parents to teach their children to be listeners. 

By age 4, children reflect many of their parents’ listening characteristics.  This comes as conflicting news for many parents, because in their multiple family roles they are not always aware that an infant is listening to their every word.  Children hear us even when we do not want to be heard.  An infant’s auditory vocabulary is influenced by and mirrors the words, vocabulary, sentence structures, and dialects their parents or their older siblings use.  Babies soak up almost everything they see and hear a parent do because they have no filtering mechanisms.

When infants do not begin to micmic parents and siblings, there is worry that hearing may be impaired. 

That is why schools are mandated through Child Find activities to use auditory testing to verify a child’s hearing

In Wisconsin, schools, daycares, pre-schools, and local physicians partner to inform young parents about the Child Find activities of local elementary schools.  One of the screenings typical of a Child Find appointment is a hearing assessment.  Teachers work with parents in the primary school when either believes that a student/child has difficulty hearing.  Testing and a diagnosis can lead to further testing and perhaps to special education service and accommodations.

https://dcf.wisconsin.gov/files/childcare/pdg/lceymeetings/2022-08-04-lcey-handout-early-childhood.pdf

What do schools do to teach listening skills?

Who at school teaches children to be listeners?  Incidentally, we may think school bus drivers are at the frontline of teaching children to listen because they are the first adult to greet a child each school day. Be clear, drivers want children to listen but they do not teach listening skills.  A drivers’ first priority is bus driving and student safety, and she/he does not typically speak instructionally but in an directing voice. 

Schools are mandated to teach children to listen and do so indirectly and directly.  One of a 4K-K teacher’s first action each morning is gaining student attention, channeling them from all the noise surrounding them as they get out of a family car or school bus, enter the school, put their things on hallway hooks or in cubbies or lockers, and enter their classroom.  The sounds of their classmates surround them.  Children hear their teacher say, “Sit down.  Eyes on me.  Give me your ears”.  And so, school listening instruction begins.

Veteran kindergarten teachers look like magicians to parents of 4-year-olds gathered for Kindergarten round ups and orientations.  They efficiently quiet squirming kids and boisterous children as easily as they herd cats.  For most veterans, the use of curated commands, signals, words, voice, body language, and attitude over time work to change behaviors and make children more amenable listeners.  Effective teaching at all levels incorporates myriads of indirect communications that move a hearing child to a listening student.

https://www.fayschool.org/kindergarten-readiness/six-strategies-to-teach-kids-to-listen

The mandate for direct instruction derives from our state’s adapting the Common Core ELA standards into Wisconsin’s ELA standards.  All children are to be instructed in listening, as well as reading, writing, and speaking.  The Wisconsin DPI standards place listening and speaking in the context of effective communications.  Schools are mandated to instruct children in how to listen and in how to speak that causes them to be active and “productive communicators” in a wide variety of school and life circumstances.

https://www.coreknowledge.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/CK_CCSS_ELAAlignment.pdf

This sayeth the mandate –

“Speaking and Listening Standards – Introduction

These standards are directed toward developing students’ abilities to productively participate in communicative exchanges. Productive participation means that students are able to communicate in large group, small group, and one-on-one exchanges with varied audiences, for varied purposes, and in varied situations; can respond to and develop what others have said; can contribute accurate, relevant information; and can analyze and synthesize a multitude of ideas in various domains. Students must have ample opportunities to take part in a variety of conversations and communicative exchanges in order to practice and apply these standards. Some standards repeat from grade-level to grade-level in recognition of the fact that students’ understandings develop and deepen over time. The ultimate goal of these standards is that students are able to understand and make flexible choices in their use of language in order to meet their communicative goals with varied audiences, for varied purposes, and in varied situations.”

https://dpi.wi.gov/sites/default/files/imce/ela/resources/Standards%20Listening.pdf

Each phrase in the above introduction points to a facet of effective communication and the last sentence poses the capstone – to meet communicative goals with varied audiences, for varied purposes, and in varied situations.  Additionally, the fluid use of the word “varied” causes almost all listening skills  instruction to be embedded in subject, content, or skills instruction.  The context is listening within the instruction of reading or math or art or PE.  Seldom do teachers provide naked listening skill instruction devoid of a context for listening to something to be learned.

Elementary teachers focus early instruction of listening skills, so children learn to listen in these multiple school situations:

  • Audience – one-to-one communications, small group, large group.
  • Purpose – listening for directions, information, entertainment, conversation.
  • Situations – casual, focused, highly important, emergencies.
  • Responding based upon purpose – repeat what is heard, interpret what is heard, personalize what is heard,
  • When choices are available, be able to make a choice based upon what has been heard.extend

Teachers prepare and move children from one learning activity to another many times during a school day.  Routines are normalized and expectations for student listening are essential.  Teachers use routine signals to alert children to listen.  They may flick the classroom lights on and off, use a chime, or a buzzer.  The concept is that the signal alerts children to listen.  Once alerted to listen, a teacher focuses students to listen for “who is to do what, how, when, and why”.  Twenty or thirty minutes later, another signal is used, students are alerted to listen, and the class moves into another activity. 

Many listening skills are universal for school children.  Given the age of elementary learners, a great deal of instructional time is committed to group expectations and how an individual student in a group or classroom listens.  One college’s teacher prep program stresses the “Three As of listening – attitude, attention, adjustment.”  Teachers must shape children’s behavior first to an attitude of community.  A recognition that all classmates matter is a huge first step for a 4K-K child.  Once teachers have each child moving from “me” to “we”, the teacher creates, uses and reinforces strategies for gaining student visual and auditory attention.  We tend to pay attention to what we are looking at and that attention helps us to block out the noise so we can focus on the sounds coming from the person being seen.  In evolving from hearing to focused listening a child is ready to adjust to what is being said, asked, or directed.

Put into context, the routine above is used to prepare children for whole group activities, like recess or lunch.  Listening routines also are used to prepare students for reading group instruction, or individual work time at interest centers in the classroom. 

https://www.centenaryuniversity.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Triple-A-Listening-Supplemental-Reading.pdf

Ready to listen is not the same as listening

Hearing to listen is a first step.  Listening for a purpose is a second.  Listening as preparation for doing something based upon what one listens to is a new step.  Studies indicate we remember only between 25-50% of what we hear – the rest is abandoned as noise.  After ten minutes of listening, most people begin to drift and can remember less that half of their initial level of remembering.  Unfocused listening results in an awareness of less than 25% of what we hear.

https://www.mindtools.com/az4wxv7/active-listening

Based upon these studies, teachers learn to “chunk” communications they want children to hear, listen to, remember, and be able to respond to or act upon.  To do this, there are several time-tested cues for getting a child to listen and follow directions.  The institutional experiences of Boys Town tell us to do this. 

When communicating with children –

  • Stay calm
  • Be direct
  • State commands positively
  • Give one command at a time 
  • Give age-appropriate instructions
  • Give brief reasons
  • Be physically present
  • Ask the child to repeat the instruction
  • Reward compliance 
  • Make sure you mean it

https://www.boystown.org/parenting/Pages/how-to-get-your-child-to-listen.aspx

Listening to what?

So far, we have addressed the importance of listening, the mandate to teach children to listen, and the general routines and frameworks for listening.  The next level, teaching children to be active listeners, is where the effective communications expectations of the mandates make an educational difference.

Accuracy.  For decades teachers have heard and used the phrase “checking for understanding”.  Ask children to repeat back to you what they listened to you say.  An accurate repeat conveys congruence – the child heard and listened to what you said.  Asking multiple children to repeat what they listened to you say creates an accountability for listening.

Don’t be surprised when a child’s repeating of what they heard you say is nothing like what you said.  They “heard”, they did not “listen”.  Listening is a learned skill.  Patience and persistence are called for.  Simply tell your information a second time and again check for understanding.  And perhaps a third and fourth time.

Because listening is an acquired skill and “acquiring” requires time to learn and time is a valuable instructional commodity, teachers sadly diminish checking for understanding over time.  Teaching accuracy in listening takes time and time wasted due to misunderstanding is far greater that the time to check for initial understanding.

Detail.  Active listening requires an ear for details, and we can teach children to pay attention to details.  The first step is to write down the details as they are verbally given.  Check for understanding on the details.  A second step is to create “responsibility” for details.  One student listens for the “who”, another for the “what”, another for the “how”, another for the “to what degree” and another for the “when”.  Check for understanding.  Rotate responsibilities as some details are given at the end of the directions and everyone must listen to the entire direction.

I observe high quality teachers checking for understanding and for the details of listening in junior and senior high school classrooms.  Not only is what the mandate tells us to do, it is best practice.

Nuance.  Many of the things we listen to are loaded with clues as to the feelings and values and dispositions of the speaker.  Accuracy and details may be further understood by the way they are delivered.  Teachers are not robotics delivering information in monotoned voices.  They imbue what they tell children with the excitement and suspense of new learning.  Children need to understand nuance and identify when it supplies extra meaning to their listening.  Have children listen specifically for descriptor words and phrases; listen to the adjectives and adverbs and prepositions.  Ask listeners to interpret the socio-emotional flavor of what they listened to. 

Clarification and response.  Assign listening students to craft a clarifying question after their listening.  Is there a detail that is not clear enough?  Is there a possible early response a listener wants to try out while still in a checking for understanding phase?  Consider all the time teachers spend answering student questions after the work has begun.  When children ask clarifying questions at the time of the directions they demonstrate and reinforce their skills as active listeners.

Synergy.  Active listening demonstrates a respect and rapport between teacher and students.  When the speaker and listeners are actively engaged, speakers are encouraged to be more descriptive of details and nuance.  Respect for the speaker

In order to propel student learning, communications must become two-way, respectful, challenging, and nuanced.  It may require specific vocabulary and exacting terms.  As communication becomes more focused in specific outcomes, the need for listening and responding skills become even greater. 

How to teach children to be active listeners?

Generalized, active listening is hearing, paying attention, listening, and an ability to respond to what is listened to.  These statements cover the waterfront of how children and teachers engage in school communications, especially as children get older.  It takes loads of concentration, focused attention, and personal commitment to be an active listener.  To be active, a listener has to set aside all of the bad habits of hearing and initial listening and shift into being a committed listener.  Active listening skills come from with in the listener.

  1. Pay attention.  When paying attention, there is about a one second lag between the speaker speaking and the listener’s brain hearing. 
  2. Show that you are listening.  When a speaker perceives you as a listener, the speaker’s brain recognizes and begins to lock into this interpersonal communication.  Take notes.
  3. Provide feedback.  Repeat key points to demonstrate listening. 
  4. Defer judgment. 
  5. Respond appropriately.  Ask valid and respectful questions, summarize key points, suggest what you want to know or do next.

https://www.mindtools.com/az4wxv7/active-listening

Elevating active listening to upper-level listening.

Knowing that active listening is within the listener yet is cued by teacher communication, we can elevate active listening by moving our teaching interactions from the lower three levels – remembering, understanding, and applying – to higher levels of thinking – analyzing, evaluating, and creating.  The sociometrics of a classroom conversation change drastically when we move from asking students for the recall or interpretation of knowledge to the comparing and contrasting ideas, evaluating an ideas significance, or generating new solutions.  Instead of teacher-student interactions, conversations become student-student exchanges.  Teachers use wait time to assure students have time to consider their arguments while using body language to assure a student who is eager to contribute will be able to do so.  Active listening leads to intellectual excitement – the teaching moments teachers cling to in their memories of classroom work. 

The United States State Department provides these four keys to their personnel regarding listening skills.

1. Seek to understand before you seek to be understood.

2. Be non judgmental

3. Give your undivided attention to the speaker

4. Use silence effectively

They read like sound advice to any teacher who is an ambassador for student learning.

https://2009-2017.state.gov/m/a/os/65759.htm

The Big Duh!

Once again we are called to use what we know to be true of good teaching and learning yet find difficult to do in the fast pacing of school life. 

We know these things.

  • Listening is a core skill essential for students at all levels of their education. 
  • Listening is a learned behavior that we must teach at all grade levels and in all subjects. 
  • Listening is more than hearing if it is to be educational. 
  • Listening takes time and commitment to the behaviors of attention, attitude, and adjustment that allow us to receive, understand, and act upon what we listen to. 
  • Active listening leads to higher levels of intellectual and academic productivity.

And we too often do these things.

  • Pace our teaching based on the first child who appears to have heard us.
  • Do not check for accuracy, detail, or nuance with enough children to assure that good listening occurred.
  • Let the clock determine what comes next in a lesson rather than what we listen to as student readiness for next instruction.

Students are more likely to mirror how we listen and use listening skills than they do our instruction in reading, writing, and speaking.  You know this is true.  Just listen to yourself.

Speak Less and Listen More

The advice Aaron Burr gives to Alexander Hamilton in the musical Hamilton applies to the best practices in teaching.  Speak less and listen more.  If we recorded the audio only for one week in a school classroom, what would be the ratio of teacher speaking to listening?  On the other hand, don’t make such a recording.  The ratio of adult to child voices may be too embarrassing.

Instead, read and consider the following statements.  Don’t talk about what you are reading – read and listen to your own thoughts about each statement.

  • The algorithm of speaking and listening related to educational outcomes begins with an understanding that what a child says is much more important than what a teacher says.  Education is about children learning not adult’s telling what they know.
  • Listening to children allows us to know the quality and quantity of their learning and understanding.  Listen for both.
  • Listening to children informs us that a child may know and understand her learning much better than can be displayed in on demand testing.  Listening is your best formative and summative assessment.
  • Listening to children helps us to know what the child needs to learn next in order to have a more complete understanding of the lesson.  After listening, you can clarify, correct, redirect, expand, and extend a child’s understanding.  If you don’t listen, all you can do is tell them the same things you already told them.
  • Listening to children shows us how a child is processing new learning and integrating new with prior learning.  Listen to how a child thinks not just what a child tells you.
  • Listening leads to questions you ask the student that leads to more listening and to more questions.  Listening leads to causing students to learn.
  • Listening to children is one of the most respectful things adults can do.  It says, “you are important to me”.  Consider how many times a child passes through an entire school day without being heard.  What does silence tell a child about how we value her?
  • Listening is interactive.  The best teachers know when to listen and when to speak.  Listening before speaking assures that speech is focused and purposeful for the listening child.

If a teacher is consistently speaking too much and listening too little, advise the teacher to change professions and become a broadcaster.  That is what broadcasters do, not teachers.

Professionalism Is As Professionals Do

School conversation, the serious flavor, between teachers and administrators and school board members often leads to the topic of treating people as professionals. Whether the talk is about teaching and learning, school policies and practices, salaries and benefits, or inclusion in decision-making, the idea of “treat me as a professional” becomes a filter for sifting ideas. I listen for it. Someone in the conversation ultimately invokes the word “professional” like a trump card in a game of bridge and others in the group are immediately tarnished with “unprofessional”. Some years past, the phrase was “I’m for our kids”. Whoever said it first took the high ground and all others were in the dirt. “Whoa”, I say. Professional treatment is a 360-degree proposition. To be treated professionally requires all to act professionally.

To paraphrase Forest Gump, “Professionalism is as professionalism does”. The only high ground is an idea or practice that is best practice and that is illuminated by professional study, consideration and action. To mix the metaphors – professionalism is the tide that raises all boats. It is not an ethereal that we blindly tip our caps to. Professionalism is in our actions, our words, our work and our expectations. It is in our commitment to the constant improvement of teaching and learning and to those engaged in this work. Yes, Forest, professionalism is what professionals do.

In the early 70s professionalism was more of a lower-case word. College graduates prepared for the profession of teacher anticipating a career of causing children to learn. However, at that time, college graduates entering their first classroom were employees in an employer-dominated era. Where allowed, strikes and work stoppages and no salary or benefit improvements were tools too often used by educational professionals against other educational professionals. In 1970 my first days as a teacher were spent “on strike” and I have not forgotten the sense of waste as the education of children was held hostage to professionalism.

I do not want to overgeneralize negatively about our history, because there also were many wonderful achievements accomplished through professional collegiality. However, when push came to shove and it did, differences arose that separated us into two or more camps of professionals. The tide raised only some boats while other boats were left tied to docks of status quo.

In my observation, professionalism is not a thermometer that we check daily or occasionally. Being professional is not fluctuating weather in the schoolhouse. It is not related to good or better or improved treatments of employees by employers, or conversely, to the attitudes of the supervised to their supervisor. Professionalism does not live when employee salaries are increased or benefits are expanded and it does not die when monies for salary and benefit enhancement are not available. Professionalism is not factored by class sizes or supply budgets. Professionalism is the doing, the process of talking and creating understanding and the constant commitment to educating children that binds educators as a profession.

I look for four tell tale signs of professionalism.

  •  Listening. Professionals take the time to personally listen to each other. The sense of hearing provides each of us with the greatest amount of information about our world and surroundings every day. We hear things unconsciously, because that is how the sense of hearing works. Listening is different. It is intentional and focused and conveys connection. I am listening to you tells me what you want me to know. Given, a lot of our conversations are inane. Yet, when one person actively listens to another, listening conveys the value of communication and shared communication is essential for professionalism to thrive.
  •  Continuing education. This is not graduate degrees for all, but it is education beyond formal education or initial training for all. Professionals intellectually consider the what, why and wherefore of their work. They conscientiously try to become more informed, better skilled and more expert in their field of work. Schools help by supporting job-related continuing education and training for all employees. Professionals take this one step further by being personally vested in their own improvement.
  •  Appreciation. There is nothing more rewarding in the schoolhouse than to be recognized and appreciated. No person in the school in any role is on the fast track to fame and fortune. Few in the schoolhouse receive much recognition for their work inside the school outside of the schoolhouse. That is why in-school appreciation is essential to its professionalism. The first step of appreciation is knowing each other’s name. When employees pass each day like ships in the night, there is no appreciation. Being recognized by name is such a small thing with such a big reward. The second step is a thank you, now and again. Thank you for the work you do; your work and you are recognized and valued. If you don’t understand this try it. Appreciation begets smiles and smiles join people together.
  •  Commitment. Professionals are not day jobbers. They are invested in the meaningfulness of their work over time. They personally evaluate the quality of their work and strive to keep their performance, no matter what the job, at the highest level they can. I have observed superintendents and board members work as hard to wordsmith a policy or proposal as the building and grounds supervisor and cleaners work to keep school restrooms clean and sanitary. Their commonality is their intrinsic desire to “do good work” that converts every employee into a school professional.

Think about your workplace. Are you listened to and do you actively listen to others? Are you personally and is your school equally engaged in your learning to be an expert in your work? Do you know that you and your work are appreciated and do you appreciate those you work with and their work? Are you collegially committed to making your school the best it can be? If you have four answers of yes, Forest Gump’s words apply to you in a most positive way.

Plan For Listening If You Want To Be Heard

Descartes opined that when no one is in the woods to hear a tree fall there is no proof that the tree actually fell.  Applied to causing learning, if a teacher is talking/teaching in a classroom and no students are listening, is teaching actually occurring?

Let’s add another question to this point.  A teacher gives oral direction to a class of twenty children.  To what extent does each child hear the same direction?

These two questions are real.  Talking and the expectation of being listened to is an assumption.  Directing and the expectation that others will understand the direction is a second assumption.  These two assumptions are made every day in classrooms and they lead us to the Cartesian conclusion:  if children are not listening and paying attention to what is being said, there is no proof that teaching and direction actually occurred.

The remedy is that we must shelve our assumptions and gather evidence.  To follow Madeline Hunter, we must teach the critical attributes of listening and we must check for understanding of what has been heard.  And, we must practice these critical attributes and checking for understanding until they are fully embedded in our teaching/learning routines.  Then, we must check them intermittently to assure that we do not fall victim to our assumptions once again.

Critical attributes of effective listening begin with the teacher.  Is the teaching and direction constructed in ways that promote attentive listening?  Are they personalized so that children can relate to the words spoken?  If a child does not know that she is expected to listen and that her success as a student is within the teaching/direction, she will not commit her attention.  Is the teaching/directing concise and without the distraction of “bird walks” of irrelevant information?  We all listen in “snippets”.  Effective teaching in five- to ten-minute bursts are consumable for attentive listening.  Directions that include three or four “to do” points are understandable for attentive listening.  Story telling and rambling and anecdotal directing cause a student to tune out and long lists of things to do are confusing.  Teachers who plan to be listened to will be heard.

Checking for understanding is child accountability.  Why would a person take their car in for a repair and not road test the car afterward to assure the repair was actually made?  We need to road test children for what they hear and understand.  Checking is requiring a child or children to demonstrate – to give evidence of what they heard and understood.  Asking a child to paraphrase an instructional snippet verbally or in writing, to connect the instructional snippet to a previous snippet, or to provide the conclusions she has reached after considering the snippet are good checking strategies.  When children know that they will be required to demonstrate their listening and understanding, they become more attentive listeners and learners.  Over time, they become more effective and interactive in their self-accountability for learning and listening.

There are many more techniques and strategies for assuring that teaching/learning and directing/listening occur in classrooms.  To prevent a Cartesian problem, it is essential that a teacher purposefully practices any of these techniques to create the evidence that children are listening and learning.  If this is not done, a teacher might as well hold class in the stillness of the woods where there is no proof that a tree actually fell.