Tag Archives: explicit teaching

Teach Up to Cause Children to Meet Higher Expectations

Posted on by
Reply

One of the most common phrases in school mission statements is “we have high expectations.” These words are used to describe school goals for academic learning, athletic and artistic performances, student behaviors, and rankings in state report cards. School boards and school leaders use the phrases “we have high expectations” and “we expect great things” as if just saying the words makes it so. They do not. What usually is not explained is what the school or teachers, coaches, and directors will do to move student achievements from “usual expectations” to “higher expectations.” The action necessary is teaching up, coaching up, directing up, and reinforcing up so that “ups” are achieved. The conversation about the actions needed to move achievement upward and the commitment to those actions is what bridges the distance between having high expectations and achieving high expectations.

Teaching up is a choice.

Carol Ann Tomlinson writes, “Teachers who make the choice to teach up believe, or are at least willing to believe, that all students are capable of much more than they currently show the world. Teachers who make the choice to teach up know that brains are malleable and thrive in rich environments. They also know, perhaps from research, perhaps from their own experiences are learners or as classroom observers, that students who have teachers that set high expectations are more likely to flourish than students who set lower expectations.”

https://ascd.org/el/articles/making-the-choice-to-teach-up

Tomlinson nails it. Teaching up to elevate student achievement is a choice when meeting minimal or usual expectations is a universal expectation or goal. The words “minimal expectations” are not used casually. Too many children and schools struggle to make minimal academic, athletic, and artistic progress. There are a multitude of environmental reasons, including poverty at home and in school financing, lack of home and familial support, lack of food security, challenges in a child’s socio-emotional and mental health, and post-pandemic student apathy that make achieving minimal achievement goals an uphill struggle. Just making minimal achievement goals can take tremendous teaching efforts.

The choice to teach up is to buck the norms in statewide assessments that say “minimal” is good enough or local expectations to be just a little better than a neighboring school and cause children to overachieve.

How much “up” and what does “up” look like?

Once a decision to teach, coach, and/or direct up is made, the real work is identifying how much upward improvement will be the target of higher expectations and the meaningful instructional, coaching, and directing actions needed to elevate student achievements to those expectations. Increasing the desired levels of achievement too much can overwhelm children, but increasing levels too little may seem meaningless. The level “up” should have transferable benefits, like climbing to the next plateau provides a base for climbing to a yet higher plateau on the way to a pinnacle. Increasing knowledge, skills, and dispositions is the scaffolding for future increases in achievement.

Generically, regular teaching is characterized by a teacher making more challenging yet supported assignments for children ready for the challenge. Students are assigned to read texts and materials that are above their current reading level preceded by the teacher pointing out new and significant vocabulary, providing necessary background information and context, and chunking the reading into smaller readings.

Generically, regular teaching is assigning more multiple step math problems, performing more complex music preceded by technical voice and fingering instruction, or diminishing the tolerances in milling a piece of metal preceded by technical instruction in settings, timing, and rate of milling.

Generically, regular coaching and directing is scheduling more successful teams to play and pieces to perform and expecting athletic and performance skills to rise to the level of new competition and expectation.

These kinds of “up” are usual in most teacher’s instruction of children in all subjects and grades, and in athletics and the arts. They are incremental and baked into school curricula.

To be significant, teaching “up” is condensing or leapfrogging usual increments and expectations with the belief that, as Tomlinson wrote, “… children’s brains are malleable and thrive in rich environments…”

“Up” looks like a demonstrably higher sophistication in the quality of student outcomes. To accomplish much higher outcomes requires explicit instruction, coaching, and directing of the knowledge, skills, and dispositions required for significantly higher achievement. Usual or regular teaching will not result in unusual or irregular achievements; it takes stronger instructional knowledge and skill.

Teaching “up” requires “upped” teaching.

Teaching, coaching, and directing “up” requires the teacher, coach and director to study, learn, and master skill sets that cause children to learn and master higher order knowledge, skills, and dispositions. These are not in initial educator preparation programs. We must learn to teach up before children can up their learning. For example, there are specific skill sets required to

  • improve children’s close reading and technical writing abilities to elevate and expand their levels of comprehension, understanding, and analysis/evaluation so that they can create more precise or expressive writings, or
  • improve players’ ability to hit a baseball and putting it in play with more frequency and power, or
  • increase children’s ability to understand the uses of perspective and interest in real life drawing, painting, and photographic creations.

Teachers must commit themselves to mastering improvements and changes in how they teach if they want children to master new learning and achieve higher order outcomes.

Teaching for higher order close reading.

Close reading is more than holding the book closer. It is a set of reading practices that require commitment. Most children give a text assignment a single read. They may take notes or create a brief outline. Better students create flash cards to self-quiz their accuracy and memory retention.

Upping reading has children do the following:

  • Read the text multiple times. First to gain a basic understanding and key ideas included in the text. Second, focus on structure, language, and the author’s writing style. They focus on text-specific questions not just questions assigned to any and every text. And in a third reading, children read and reflect on both the text and relate it to their knowledge and understanding of other texts. Children consistently write notes, annotate, and reflect on key literary and text analysis questions.
  • To focus on reading comprehension, the teacher chunks the text and engages children with reading aloud and thinking aloud. Thinking aloud is reacting and responding immediately to what has been read. Doing things aloud takes time and consideration and these two elements push the reading and thinking upward.
  • Teachers teach children a Socratic discussion model and children use this model to up their comprehension, interpretations, and insights. Children are expected/required to engage in discussions. As children listen to other children, they reflect on, consider, and edit and amend their own thoughts and conclusions. Socratic processing benefits the speaker and the listener.
  • Parallel to multi-step reading and Socratic discussion, children use graphic organizing techniques the teacher has taught them to break down the text into logical parts that aid in their memory and recall. They use and then file these organizers for future references.
  • Children act out a part of the literary text, rewrite a part to create a different outcome, or creatively illustrate the setting of part(s) of the text. For non-literary text, children create chronologies of actions leading up to and after the information in the text or create parallels of what else is happening simultaneously with the text.

These, or all of these, are not usual in classroom instruction focused on knowledge and understanding of the general curriculum. In the aggregate, these teaching/learning episodes move a child’s cognitive, social-emotional, and performance-based achievements to higher order levels. They are demonstrable for the teacher’s peers, administrators and the child’s parents to observe and acknowledge.

Coaching up for improved hitting technique.

I played on several state championship baseball teams in my high school years and never was instructed in hitting. To improve hitting, we took more batting practice and rotated in pitchers with different deliveries and throwing velocities. The only critique when we struck out was “you need more practice.”

Coaching up for hitting involves the following:

  • Having the hitter not just assume a batting stance but analyze the set up and stance. Is the stance balanced on the width of the feet with flexed knees, bend or no bend at the waist, and good weight distribution. The hitter needs to talk aloud with the coach about the stance set up in order to understand how a stance and set up work. The hitter needs to do this in the batters box and in front of a mirror or camera. Too many hitters think they are balanced and flexed when they are not. The coach needs to press hands on the batter to check for balance, flex, and weight distribution.
  • In the stance and set up, are the hands in natural position near the back shoulder, does the head position allow for a clear vision of the pitcher and ball in flight, and are the toes, knees, hips, and shoulders aligned. Hitters don’t do this solo, but under the supervision and critique of the coach. Many hitters think their stance and set up are solid when they are not.
  • Swinging the bat is not just swinging the bat. In preparing to swing, the hitter’s weight should be slightly loaded on the back foot while maintaining a balanced posture. The stride forward initiates the swing and rotation of the shoulders. A hitter’s stride is highly individualized, but if it is too long or too short it disrupts the plane, power, and release of the swing. During the stride, the hitter starts with a hip then shoulder rotation to create torque and power. There is a natural release and forward press of the upper body. Coaches can detect better than hitters when the release and press are not natural.
  • Swinging on a plane is essential to striking a thrown pitch. On plane gets the bat into the hitting zone leading with the hands (bat pointing slightly behind the hands). Hitters need to be consistent with their plane – is it down with bat control for hitting hard ground balls, is it parallel to the plate for hitting line drives with power or is it upward for long fly balls. Gifted hitters can change swing planes depending on game situations. Most hitters need consistency and coach supervision, critiquing, and correction to create and consistently be on lane.
  • Getting the bat to the ball is just the start. Hitters need to extend their arms through contact with the ball to drive the ball. Pitch speed, bat speed, and extended driving through the ball create power. Extension plus rotation to a high finish with the bat behind the lead shoulder almost to the hitter’s back makes a complete swing.
  • Hitting coaches study the art and science of swinging a bat and hitting a ball. They know that each hitter has a different physique and baseball personality. Hence, coaching hitters is a highly individualized and personalized endeavor. Coaches use soft toss and front toss drills, live batting practice, video analysis, and consistent work on identifying a pitch as it leaves the pitcher’s hand. Hitters have fractions of a second to make the decision to swing or not swing at a pitch and if they swing their mechanics need to be designed and practiced for hitting success.

The fact is that most coaches coach a team to play baseball or softball. They have a basic understanding of throwing, catching, hitting, running the bases and sliding, and fielding ground balls and pop flies. They do not have the skill sets to up player performance with explicit instruction in any of the game’s skills. It is the difference between a coach saying, “just do this” and another coach saying “this is the physiology and physics of doing this.” Upping requires knowing what up is.

The Big Duh!

Tomlinson told us that “…all students are capable of much more than they currently show the world.” It is a teacher who causes them either to achieve only the minimum expectations that our world holds for our students, athletes, and artists or to show their much higher levels of achievement and performance. It is both a teacher’s decision to teach up and a teacher’s ability to teach up that moves child achievements upward.

Sharpening Teaching Tools – Getting Ready for Day 1 Means Getting the Rust Off

Posted on by
Reply

Teachers and Tiger Woods face the same challenges as professionals.  When Woods returned to the PGA tour after time away his game was not what it once was.  When precision skills are not used frequently enough to remain honed, they develop rust.  Summer vacations and time in general have the same effect on teaching skills.  Before re-entering the teaching season this fall, all teachers need to sharpen their teaching tools to get rid of summer rust.

What do we know?

Summer is a cherished time for teachers as well as children.  Ten weeks or so away from the classroom is exactly what it is – an absence away and a setting aside of the teaching skills used in classroom work.  As teachers decompress from the stress of daily teaching in the nine months of school, the mental acuities of teaching slumber during the summer weeks.  This has been an aspect of the nine months on and three months off in an educational calendar for decades.  It is one of the reasons school leaders schedule professional development days before the first day of school.  Like their riding a bike, teachers don’t forget how to teach over a summer’s vacation, but they do profit from time back on the pedals before children enter their classrooms.

Getting ready for the first day of school is not just arranging a classroom to receive children.  Getting ready also is shaking loose the summer slumber/rust by clinically considering how a teacher will teach the first curricular units of the year.

Explicit Instruction

One of the most frequently used instructional strategies is explicit teaching, a step-by-step approach that purposefully connects teaching strategies with learning outcomes for children.  Direct instruction is one of the primary methods in explicit teaching.  Direct instruction teaches a chunk of content or skills, checks for student understanding and accuracy, and then teaches a next chunk.  Explicit teaching also entails an examination of the critical attributes of the content and skills to be learned, scaffolding those attributes into a sequence that leads to student proficiency with the content and skills, the use of formative and summative assessments of student learning, and the ability to reteach what students did not learn correctly.  And explicit instruction focuses on the children as learners, understanding that every group of children arrives with differing learning backgrounds and learning needs.

https://education.ky.gov/curriculum/standards/kyacadstand/Documents/EBIP_3_Explicit_Teaching_and_Modeling.pdf

While it is possible for a teacher to walk into a classroom on the first day of school and begin teaching from the rote memory of their first day one year ago, it is better practice for a teacher to review and consider all the steps and processes of instruction before day one.  Getting the rust off means a teacher expends the time and effort to reconsider the first curricular units of the new school year in terms of what the teacher needs to do each class session to cause all children to learn.  Reconsidering the uses of explicit instruction is a good way to rub off the rust.

Key questions:

What do children already know?  The purpose of direct instruction is not “how to tell students what they are to learn”, but determining what students already know, what they need to learn, and the best way to deliver that new learning.  Decisions about telling, demonstrating, inquiring about, or experiencing individually or in groups come after determining what needs to be learned.

Who are these children?  What are their strengths and challenges as learners?  Which children are new to our school and need social acclimation as well as instruction?  What assumptions about these children can a teacher make with confidence?

How will new learning be chunked into teaching/learning in small enough amounts so that all children can successfully process their instruction?

How much engagement time is needed for all children to successfully learn a chunk of instruction?  This is pacing.  Most teachers and students want to “get at it” quickly in the first days of school.  Pacing new learning is essential to assure that getting at it creates successful learning.

How will I know that all children are proficient in their new learning?  Much of formative assessment is observational – seeing and hearing children in the processes of their learning.  Some of formative assessment is quizzing.  Getting the rust off is rebalancing a teacher’s confidence in observing students at work to know if they are being successful or need reteaching or different teaching to be successful.

The Practice of Rehearsal

We rehearse many things consciously and unconsciously.  I would not make a golf shot without taking several practice swings to understand the terrain of the ground, the lie of the ball, the bottom of my swing arc, and the way I want to hit the ball.  I mentally phrase many responses to questions prior to speaking or writing to ensure I am focused on the question, have facts to support what I say or write, and can deliver my words in a tone that fits the occasion.  Rehearsals, physical, cognitive, and emotional, provide assurance that what is to be done or said is targeted and purposeful.

The theory of rehearsal says that when a person reviews what is needed and preliminarily practices a delivery of what is needed, the delivery may not be perfect, but it will be a faithful representation of the best the person can deliver.  And that is what getting the rust of teaching skills is all about.

Last school year I stood in a classroom doorway watching an elementary teacher prepare for teaching a lesson.  She talked aloud but softly as she told herself the objectives of the lesson, what she and her students had done the days before, and the new instruction she would teach this day.  She checked her laptop to assure the presentation of new information was queued up.  She checked a stack of handouts she would give to students.  She repeated the outcomes she would look for by the end of the lesson.  Lastly, she said the names of two students she needed to check frequently and give more assistance.  She was in a rehearsal zone and unaware she was being watched.  At the end, she smiled; she was ready.

I have observed chemistry teachers laying out a lab, writing teachers keying in on a complete versus incomplete sentence structures, PE teachers rehearsing the flexibility exercises they would teach, and math teachers reviewing problem solutions on a screen – each one practicing purposeful rehearsals before students arrived for instruction.

The Big Duh!

As it is true that we get what we settle for, the quality of student learning we get is a direct reflection of the quality of teaching we provide.  Teachers are professional educators with the skills to deliver high quality lessons.   Rehearsing instructional skills prior to teaching better ensures the opportunity to use very sharp teaching skills.

When it comes to study skills, “You are on your own, kid.”

Posted on by
Reply

Because teaching children how to study is not in our curriculum and teachers are not taught how to teach studying skills in their teacher preparation programs.  Inconceivable, you might think, but true.  As a result, the random ability of a child to self-develop personal study skills becomes a highly reliable predictor of academic success in high school.  And it is a random ability.

Check it out.  Ask any group of high school students to explain their study habits.

You may find a child who enjoys virtual photographic memory.  This child reads or sees something one time and on test day recalls that initial intake with astounding reliability.  This child, though an outlier and rare, obscures our concepts of studying.  We cannot generalize about their uniqueness.

Most students will report they reread pages of their textbook and review their notes of what the teacher said in class.  A second “most” will report they do a reread and review one or two nights before a scheduled test.  Usually, they cram!

A few will say they reread text material and “rewrote their notes”.

One or two will say they “reread the text and their notes, identified key words and ideas, made flash cards of these and tested themselves on their flash cards until they memorized this information”.  They add, “I start several days before the test”.  When asked, “Who told you to study like this?”, none will say “My teacher”.  This is metacognitive studying.  Sadly, we do not teach children how to do this.  You will not find it in any publishing guide or in a baccalaureate teacher prep curriculum.

Want to hazard a guess as to which children get high grades and which children do not?

What do we know?

The slope of responsibility for independent study starts as a flat line in the primary grades, approaches 45 degrees in the intermediate grades and then goes vertical in the secondary grades.  The degree of responsibility for independent study is not met with explicit instruction teaching children how to study.  We literally tell children what to study and then say “go study” thinking effective study techniques are in each child’s genetic map. 

Observations of K-4 classrooms show teachers telling children what to know, practicing what to know, and reteaching when children are not successful in initial knowing with good regularity.  This good practice has not changed much over time.  Parents will remember their teachers using the chalkboard to write out new words, ideas, and arithmetic strategies.  Children today see their teachers doing the same on smart interactive screens.  The “write it, say it, explain it” pedagogy works well in the primary grades for teaching all subjects.  The amount of information or skills being taught/learned is controlled by the teacher who uses repetition as drill and practice to drive home daily learning.  Teacher guided repetition works well until the batch of new information increases in volume or the degree of complexity increases in middle school.  There is little independent homework in the primary grades; mostly children do projects at home and bring them to class to show.

Intermediate teachers traditionally tell their students “The amount of homework you will be assigned in middle school is significantly more than we are doing.  Be ready!”.  Fair warning, but children need more than just a warning.

The following describes what middle school students are told to do to be successful in their homework and independent study.  I hear these “keys to doing homework” repeated annually in middle school classrooms.

  • Establish a study area at home.
  • Communicate with the teacher.
  • Keep assignments organized.
  • Avoid procrastination.
  • Take notes in class.
  • Highlight key concepts in the reading materials.
  • Prepare your book-bag before going to bed.

https://www.kumon.com/resources/7-important-study-habits-for-school/

Why is this the state of study skills?

These hints are like telling children that brushing their teeth daily promotes dental health.  Once told, no one checks on their brushing practices.  Likewise, once we provide the above hints for homework success.

The real culprit lies with teacher preparation.  A review of our state’s college and university teacher preparation curricula shows not a single course unit devoted to teaching children how to study.  Our required curricula assure licensed teachers possess content knowledge, pedagogical skills, understanding of human relations, and informed dispositions about the diverse students they teach, but there is not one mention of how to teach student study skills.  In essence, teachers are prepared to teach children what to know but not how to learn it.

Helpful but not complete practices

Some schools insert a unit in study skills in the middle school curriculum.  The dominant study skill taught is note taking and the predominant technique for taking notes is the Cornell system.

The Cornell Note Taking System

However, study skills and note taking, once taught are seldom if ever checked afterward.  We treat the initial instruction of study skills like a vaccine, once given then forever safe from the fate of poor study habits.  Nothing is further from the truth.  One month after the Cornell system is taught to children, I do not observe any teacher explicitly checking each child’s note taking.  There is no follow-up and that is on us as teachers and principals.

A second practice that has merit is providing students with a study guide.  Teachers who do this hand each student a preview of what will be tested.  A study guide looks like an outline of the teacher’s teaching notes.  For some students, the study guide helps them to check the validity of their note taking.  Notes should reflect the guide.  Study guides are great, but they also revert to the issue of how to study.  A student who just reads and rereads the study guide is only a tad better off than a student who reads and rereads the text and personal notes.  They achieve familiarity with the material, not a usable understanding of it.  There is no metacognitive practice is giving a study guide without teaching how to use it.

What do we need – to teach all children a metacognitive study strategy and hold children accountable for using it.  The following is one example.

There are several strategies for moving a student from familiarity with information to a usable understanding.  Part of these strategies are organizational, and part is repetitive memorization and practice.  The following strategy can be applied to every subject, all academic content, and all skills.  It is time tested.  It is a discipline for successful metacognitive learning.

  1. Teach all children to:
    • Read the text material to identify new key vocabulary and ideas, cause and effect relationships, questions that are posed and conclusions that are stated.
    • Use a note taking system to listen to a teacher’s lesson noting key vocabulary, new ideas and skills, and how the teacher displays those skills (math strategies).
    • Reread the text material for familiarity with it – “I know what it is about”.
    • Make flash cards of the key vocabulary and ideas, cause and effect relationships, steps in a problem-solving strategy, and conclusions the text or teacher make in the lessons. Key words on one side of the note card and definition on the other.
    • Either partner with a parent or classmate using flash cards. “Show me the word and I will define it. Check me. If I am wrong, tell me the correction.” Children should repeat this until they can respond correctly to each flash card prompt.
  2. Prior to a math or science test, teach all children to:
    • Do the problems in the textbook or on teacher assignment sheets again, as if they are a new assignment. Do the entire problem. Show all the work, as if you are explaining it to the teacher.
    • Repeat the scientific process related to recent lessons. What is the hypothesis, what is the evidence, what is the conclusion? Flash card this material.
  3. DO THIS! Commit class time to personally checking each child’s study materials.
    • Check their note cards for accuracy in identifying key vocabulary and ideas, relationships, and questions/conclusions.
    • Check their reworking of math and science problems.
    • Tell each child what is right and what is wrong in their study materials.
  4. DO THIS! Commit class time for children to practice their flash cards and to rework math and science problems. Observe them studying and reinforce/correct their study strategy.
  5. DO THIS consistently for several units and them randomly during the remainder of the school year.

The Big Duh!

There should be no mysteries in the education of a child.  Our goal is for all children to be successful and to do that we must give them the tools, the strategies, and our help in perfecting those.  Success in school should not be left to the random insights of a child into how to study.  Our success as teachers should be when every child demonstrates strong study skills, and every child achieves high grades.  We are not successful otherwise.