School Requires less Moore

If I was educated in school, what am I now?  Am I edu-inoculated for years to come?  The concept of an educated person is a constantly moving target.  Each generation goes to school to graduate with a diploma certifying proficiency in a curriculum that is out of date or semi-irrelevant almost before the cap and gown have been removed.  How is this so?  We apply Moore’s Law regarding the speed at which computer chip generations change to education.  Except for “rear view mirror studies” of history and literature as soon as something is learned in the present tense it is morphed and altered with new applications and needs of the future.  Schooling today is not about being educated but about skills for a student’s ability to be constantly educating for all the years after graduation.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore%27s_law

Want a case in point?  Members of the Class of 22 struggled to write the perfect college admissions essay or job application.  Members of the Class of 23 will insert key words and an AI bot will generate as many essays and applications as class members could want.  Moore told us this would happen.  Education does not stand still.

Why is this thus?

We are an additive addicted people.  We are addicted to the next new thing and want it immediately.  Our closets are full of past year’s shoes.  Our garages brim with gizmos that popped up in yesterday’s social media ad.  Our front doors are drop off stations for Amazon Prime.  We see it, we order it, we have it!  We are addicted to the next things to add to our lives and the almost instant gratification of Internet shopping.

“New and more” are our go to solutions to problems.  At the end of every commercial we anticipate the “…But wait!”, and the next bit of something we can purchase appears.  Check your credit card bills to ascertain your personal addictions.

Addictive addiction also applies to education and it makes our current concepts of academic education obsolete.  For our children to be educated for a life of education, Moore must become less to become better.

Where to start? 

Empty the closet of what no longer works or is needed.

For almost 120 years public education has used the Carnegie Unit, the assignment of one graduation credit for one hour of daily instruction for one school year, as the gold standard for validating school learning.  In our local school, a high school graduate must complete 26 credits of prescribed and elective course work.  These are piled on the faux credits of middle school’s annual curricula of ELA, math, science, and social studies, that are piled on annual grade level curricula in elementary school.  4K-12 schooling is a box of Carnegie Units that depict our concept of education as an aggregate of additives.

The purpose of the Carnegie Unit was to standardize and stabilize secondary education using a collegiate model.  This filled a need in 1906 that does not exist in 2023.  The fact that we still use the Unit is testimony to education’s resistance to change.  Sticking to four credits of English, three credits of math, three credits of science, and three credits of social studies assured that our out-of-date academics were change resistant.  When the next “add this” is discussed by a school board, the educator’s response should be “The class day is full and can take no more.

https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/the-high-school-credit-hour-a-timeline-of-the-carnegie-unit/2022/12

Trade in the Unit for proficiencies

We, as educators, need to focus education on educational skills graduates will need to remain educable over time.  Here is the “new bimodal model”:  our 4K-8 students need to be proficient in academic skills needed for lifelong learning AND our grade 6-12 students need to be proficient in the use of knowledge and skills that can be expanded over time for their adult successes. 

We must teach the essential life skills and dispositions for children in our primary grades that will be the foundation of their life’s continuing education.  Everything else in 4K-12 and post-graduation education and training is application and extension requiring these essential life skills.  It really is easy once we scrape back all the “nice to do” and “momentary enrichments” that cloud our ability to educate children for lifelong learning.

Proficiencies for the elementary school; all else is secondary

  • Ability to read and listen, comprehend, analyze, and effectively use information to illuminate a student’s world.
  • Ability to effectively listen and communicate (express ourselves through speech, writing, art, and music). 
  • Ability to quantify, measure, and value through statistical analysis. 
  • Ability to tolerate, collaborate, and cooperate in a multi-cultural, multi-dimensional world.
  • Ability to respect and expect respect.

Why these?

The concept follows the truth of “Give a man a fish, you feed him for a day.  If you teach him to fish, you feed him for a lifetime”.  Moore tells us that the speed of life changes is inexorable.  Information is a daily flood.  We are exposed to more things to see and hear every day.  Therefore, essential skill sets that universally underlie Moore’s predicted changes need to be the foundational curriculum for every child.  Regardless of what our future presents, these are skill sets that will allow children growing into adulthood to learn and always be educated to meet their future.

How do we do this? 

  • Align school board, administrators, and teachers to prescribed and defensible standards of student performance.

School boards, school leadership, and faculty are the products of past education.  Start by declaring a new day; set aside the confines of how you were educated.  Do not approve a future that is a clone of the past.

Historically, we provided children with instruction.  “Provided” was a soft euphemism for “here it is kids, learn what you can” of what the school offers.  Today, we must ensure student learning and performances validate learning.  “Ensure” means we teach until we have evidence that all children meet or exceed the board-adopted standards.  We no longer offer; we teach for learning.

Alignment starts with school board policies that are crafted by insightful school leaders and faculty.  Within each policy must be wording that tells teachers, children, and parents, “these are the minimum proficiencies that your child must perform to qualify for promotion to the next grade”.  Alignment continues with principals working with each teacher to write and teach units and lessons that incrementally cause all children to achieve the required proficiencies.  Alignment means that teachers can use all appropriate skills to ensure the teaching and learning of the required proficiencies.  Alignment means that parents must be adults with their children and support the teacher’s instruction.  This does not mean that parents do not partner with their children’s teachers to mutually understand and daily schoolwork; but it does mean that all partnering is focused on a child’s achievement of required proficiencies.

  • Commit to 4K through grade 5 learning proficiencies. 

Commitment means to ensure that every child has successfully learned grade level proficiencies through 5th grade for these essential skills.  Every child must be proficient.

For too long instruction has been time-based and taught to the standard of “if you don’t learn it this year, you will be taught it next year”.  In an industrial culture that needed socialized and literate workers, graduates who never achieved proficiency in their essential skills found employment and adult life in factories.  They were taught shop specific skills necessary for daily work.  Many became skilled in the trades of the shop – foundry men, iron workers, mill operators, fabricators, assembly linemen (and women).  I worked in the 60s and 70s with meat packers who started on the hog side of the plant doing entry level work and were promoted to skilled knife trimmers over the years.  These men and women earned a good living and raised their families based upon the industrial wage and benefit.  Those jobs no longer exist.

School boards must devise policies for administrators to enforce true proficiency standards for each grade’s skill sets.  This starts with board members holding firm to standards of student performance, because there will be hue and cry for exceptions.  No problem.  Accommodation will allow all students to meet the standards without disregarding the standards.

  • Commit to the professional development required for all teachers to teach to high student performance standards.  This level of teaching does not exist universally today because educational traditions expect student performances to conform to a bell curve and teachers teach to that expectation.  To lop off the left-hand side of the bell curve, teachers need training in explicit assessment and instruction and reinforced commitment that all children will perform at or above the former mean.
  • Achieve the impossibility:  Every child reads, writes, speaks, and listens at a 5th grade level of a standards-based curriculum.  Every child not just the top 10%.

No school board has been able to say this historically.  No community has ever been able to say this to all their children.  It has been impossible when boards were blindly locked to archaic concepts of schooling.  And, as long a board lacked commitment to universal high standards for student performance.  And, if excuses were acceptable.  Eliminate the archaic concepts and accept no excuses.

What is the future of Moore?

There always will be change.  The speed and volume of change will increase.  Moore got it right.

If we separate 4K-5 education from 6-12 education, we ca apply Moore to secondary education only after we have made all children in elementary school secure with the skill sets that will allow them to understand and apply the changes they are presented.  No Moore until children are ready for Moore.

Inform Yourself Globally – Act Locally

“Water, water everywhere.  Nor any drop to drink”, wrote Coleridge in the Rime of the Ancient Mariner.  We feel the mariner’s pain today when we write, “News, news everywhere.  Nor any idea to validate”. 

There was a day when I awaited the postman for my monthly subscriptions to educational journals and periodicals.  Today’s in-box is flooded with both subscribed and unsolicited postings.  As soon as I seek educational info on the web, the all-seeing eye of its hosts provides a torrent of information.  News information cascades in such a flood that it is often difficult to find one uncontradicted idea to pursue, one idea that is can be validated and is worthy of implementing.

Still, it is essential for an educator to read and inquire globally.  Reading with such a wide lens creates an understanding of the scope and depth of issues.  Case in point – the pandemic is worldwide and pandemic effects on education are worldwide.  Its manifestations lead to intriguing and unnerving stories that will affect today’s students and our educational institutions for decades.  Gaps in educational achievement caused by poverty, interrupted access to instruction, and personal social-emotional distress are evident across the nation.  Teaching and learning are changed by the pandemic.  The entire educational enterprise in our pandemic world is changed in ways we cannot yet fathom.

The lingering question is – all indications tell us that pandemic school is and will not be like pre-pandemic school – how does this information affect our local school?

What do we know?

One strand within the flood of news is this – pandemic children returning to school in 2022 are not like pre-pandemic children who left school in 2020.  Strengthen this strand to include teachers.  Students and teachers in 2022 are not like students and teachers in 2020.  Globally, all indicators tell us that this statement is true.

What to do?

This may be a lottery-winning question.  Hundreds of thousands of schools in our nation are on the cusp of this question.

Test the questions above.  Will the 2022 students and teachers in your school be like the 2020 students and teachers you knew?

We are at Robert Frost’s fork in the road.  We either –

  • Like our 2020 school so much that we reinvent that iteration of teaching and learning, student and teacher relationships, and educational services, or,
  • Accept that 2020 is history and 2022 is the present and has more to do with the future than 2020.  We analyze our current, local conditions and create/reform educational services that address the changed nature of students, teachers, and teaching and learning.

Why is this decision necessary?

Globally, the news tells us that pandemic education is caught in a whirlpool.  We are spinning around in a cycle of indecision – make schooling continuous, 2020 and beyond or acknowledge that true changes have occurred.  Test this statement in the evidence of your own reading. 

A local school needs to jump out of the spin cycle and decide its future.  It cannot be both – a 2020 and 2022 school.  Until a local school makes this decision and acts locally, that school and everyone associated with it remains in a quandary of a lack of focus.  Our children, teachers, and community deserve a focus.

Look at the state of education at large then act locally to bring your school out of the pandemic whirlpool.

Institutional Elasticity Stymies Growth

As a child I was fascinated with elasticity.  First it was rubber bands.  Stretch them, twist them, tie and untie them, bunch them into a ball, and they always return to their essential shape.  Good old rubber bands.  Then it was Silly Putty.  Extract it from its container, shape it, tear it into bits, make it into anything you want, and then put it back in its container.  Voila!  Silly Putty melted and molded back to the internal shape of the container and was ready for more future silliness.

Public education, both in the pandemic and in the post-pandemic, has been exceedingly elastic.  And, required to be exceedingly elastic by our school communities.  All the accommodations schools made for the continuing instruction of children over two-plus fraught school years were stretches to meet the emergency.  And, just as soon as the various levels of emergency ended there was an immediate expectation that school would return to its pre-molded shapes of the past.  Public education is expected to be institutional silly putty in the face of change.  Any forward movement or change will be countermanded by an equal or greater snap back toward past practices.  Elasticity does not lead to permanent change.

This is not a put down or a slam, but an objective observation.

Test this hypothesis regarding educational elasticity.  What aspect of institutionalization was permanently changed by the pandemic?  School calendar and school day, curriculum, rules and regulations, school athletic and activity life, instruction of children with exceptional needs, and faculty and staff employments – all snapped back to the pre-pandemic norms just like a good old rubber band. 

The pandemic certainly added to the challenges of future public education.  Mental health and social-emotional welfare of children and school employees jumped to the forefront of many school conversations.  Gaps in student learning and achievement are evident.  Shortages in the candidate pool for every category of school employee arose during and continue after school closures.  These three may be our most significant post-pandemic challenges.  Yet, our elastic institution is required to meet all new challenges with old institutional thinking.  We are struggling to fit mental health and SEO programming into the old Silly Putty can of a school day and school year and already budgeted school revenues.  We are compromised – do we fill gaps in learning or teach this year’s curriculum?  It is difficult to do both with fidelity.  Even though there are real shortages in every category of classroom teacher, my work with the WI DPI finds few alternative pathways being approved even when the alternative meets the rigor of teacher license requirements.  Snap back personified.

Test the hypothesis of elasticity within schools.  What new options and pathways are being approved to meet these challenges?  Generally, nada.  The first and dominant impulse is to make the spring of 2022 look and feel like the spring of 2019.  We are trying to fix post-pandemic challenges with pre-pandemic tools.  Every news story about school districts across the nation trying new approaches to new as well as old challenges is quickly followed with stories about slap back and snap back. 

Heaven help the school board that makes remote education, simultaneous studio teaching, and Zooming a regular instructional delivery.

It is the nature of a true institution to be change resistant.  Institutions by definition have a constancy of predictable behavior.  Lack of predictability causes lack of confidence.  In general, our test of predictability is that today’s school must behave like the school adults attended when we were children.  That is the same definition our parents and grandparents used to assure predictive continuity – unchanged schools.

Without causing too much uproar, we need to reform one of the three underlying assumptions about public education. 

  • Parents and the economic community depend upon the school as predictable day care for all children of school age.
  • Children depend upon the school to educate them in preparation of continuing education after graduation or beginning steady employment.
  • Schools are institutional not dynamic agencies.

The first assumption is tied to the constancy of day and time.  As a generalization, the calendar is September 1 to June 1 and the clock resembles an adult workday, 8:00 am to 4:00 pm.  Without exception, adults schedule their adult world around the predictability of the school’s provision of day care.  This assumption is inviolate; the scope of educational reform is restricted by the need for all children to be in school on all scheduled school days.  If the calendar and clock are malleable, many more options are available for matching selected children with selected programs at selected times of the day.  Personalization and differentiation increase dramatically.  Day care is day and time based; education is outcome based.  Which will prevail?

The second assumption questions the two traditional tracks of 4K-12 education.  Our traditional paradigm is all children are in a college track or they are in a world of work track.  A new paradigm may say – in 4K-5 children achieve foundational learning and in 6-12 children apply, extend, and enrich foundational learning.  Historically, the college track fed the future of professional careers, and the non-college track fed the future of business, trades, and labor.  The reality of college debt and its punitive effect upon twenty- through thirty-year olds is reducing college matriculation annually.  A local school that traditionally sent 95-97% of its graduates to college now sends 75-80%.  Additionally, the very productive options for personal, experience-based education that is not associated with higher education tells us to rethink tracking in favor of blended education and career exploration, apprenticeship, and internship for students in grades 6-14.  Will the snap back to traditional and institutional tracking define the future or will an extended and expanded secondary education provide innovative options for transitioning students into adulthood?

Finally, the third assumption is about fences.  Is the best provision of public education institutional or dynamic?  When a school board seeks a new district administrator, are they hiring leadership that assures continuity of past programming or innovative thinking for new opportunities?  It makes a difference.  Educators follow their leadership, and the nature of a school aligns to its leader.  Institutional thinking is about fencing that assures constancy and the predictable delivery of past outcomes.  Dynamic thinking looks beyond the fences to possibilities.  What kind of agency should our school be?

If 2019 can fix our needs for 2022-23, then let’s keep playing with Silly Putty.  If 2022-23 and beyond requires more than pre-2019 provided, let’s enjoy elasticity in our Spandex not our schools.