Standards and Rigor Within Remote Education

I observe three examples of how remote educators are addressing academic standards and rigor.

  1. A high school science teacher is adhering exactly to his traditional, standards-based curriculum guide.  All students are receiving a streamed, synchronous and recorded, daily instruction that matches the level of teaching they would receive if sitting in class.  There is no deviation in presentational pace.  All students are Zooming as classes or as chat groups or as individuals with the teacher.  Students are able to call, text, or e-mail the teacher at any time and he responds to all.  He prioritizes “talking” with students about their daily work to ensure they stay engaged.  Recorded lessons do not replace live lessons; they allow students to check what they are learning with the original instruction. Class work assignments are supported with on-line or school-bus delivered materials.  Quizzes and tests remain on a schedule that will assure that all students will receive a full annual curriculum, including AP level courses. 
  • A middle school teacher is streaming three synchronous Zoom sessions each day – ELA, Math and Science/Social Studies.  Each session is a presentation of new instruction.  All class work is posted on the class on-line platform.  Most posts are practice exercises related to the new instruction.  The assignments are a combination of school-approved curriculum and vendor/on-line materials.  Students receive enough daily material to keep them busy for six to seven hours each school day.  Submitted assignments are checked and graded and grades are posted on the student’s personal school account.  Student calls, texts and e-mails are answered in the following days. 
  • An elementary teacher posts three lesson each day – ELA, Math and Science or Social Studies.  New instruction, alternating with instructional review, is presented about every other day.  Instruction is derived from an on-line, commercial curriculum.  Daily class work is posted on the class on-line platform and provides practice exercises for the teacher’s instruction.  Most students complete their daily work in 30 to 45 minutes.  There is little opportunity for children to communicate via phone call, text or e-mail with their teacher.  Assignments are reviewed by the teacher and percentage/grades are posted on the student’s personal school account.

Academic rigor and standards-based instruction are not at the top of a school’s priority list these days.  They lie well below the daily demands of deciding whether children will be in-school or at-home or managing the amount of time a child is in either place.  They lie below the challenge of maintaining daily teaching when faculty and classroom support staff who quarantined due to positive tests of contact tracing.  They lie below the demands of daily mitigation protocols necessary for schoolhouse doors being open to any person.  Like a debt that is ignored over time because the need for daily living expenses are more demanding, the issue of academic rigor will one day need to be paid.

Most states have waived traditional, statewide K-12 testing regimens due to the pandemic.  End-of-year tests were not administered in the spring of 2020 and typical baseline tests were not administered in the fall of 2020.  Waivers or work-arounds abound regarding attendance, rules for daily physical activity, and minutes of required instruction in subject areas.  Nothing has been removed from the statutes, department of instruction regulations, or even school board policies.  Waivers are the rule of the day.

We are left with the “in the mean time” problem of preparing children for the day when the waivers are lifted – for the day the assessments return.  And, they will return.  It is probable that our state will not enforce statewide testing in the 2020-21 school year, but my money is on a reinstatement in 2021-22.  How will the education provided during the pandemic serve our children after the pandemic?

There is a sweep of articles being written about the “lost generation”, children in school during the Time of COVID whose education has been disrupted or up-ended.  This is not a lost generation.  The term is a misapplication of a label applied post-World War One to those whose innocence of the world had been shattered by the war’s death and destruction.  It is interesting that the generation of young Americans who fought and survived World War Two were labeled the “Greatest Generation”.  What new label will be attached to our children today – certainly not “lost”.

That said, the reality that academic rigor and fidelity to educational standards will be reinstated should cause us to re-think the education we are providing today.  Will a child a year from now, pencil or keyboard in hand, facing an academic assessment whisper to her test question, “We did not learn this in our pandemic classes”. 

If your school district has demanded that all remote education for its children will be standards-based and that the school’s quality requirements will be upheld throughout remote education, stop reading now.  You are on the right track at the right time.  If not, please keep reading.

When children are at-home learners, faces on a screen that seem totally unschool-like, it is easier to dismiss daily rigor and standards.  Just getting connected is a success.  Just getting a lesson presented is a success.  Getting responses from a child is a success.  Engaging remotely with children is a real success.  Rigor and standards?  Not so much a success.

But, that is the problem we will face tomorrow and every day after that tomorrow if we don’t address rigor and standards today. 

As a thought, ratchet up rigor and standards in your remote education a little each week.  Begin with the standards.  Assure that a growing number of assignments point at the appropriate academic standards for your children.  Look again at assignments children already have completed to verify standards that have been addressed.  On your annual checklist of grade level or course-specific academic standards, do a check-off of what has been and has not been addressed in September.  Get back on a standards-based track.  Before long, all assignments will be standards-based. 

Gradually increase your demands for rigor.  Move from pass/fail back toward your traditional quality requirements.  No longer count connected engagement as an end-success but as a beginning for success.  Correct responses and corrected responses improve correctness.  Push children to move from good to better to best. 

I congratulate our local school district where the Board confirmed that all teachers will provide instruction using the district’s standards-based curriculum only.  In the past week, elementary teachers began administering the school’s academic screening tests for reading and math to ascertain individual and class status on annual performance expectations.  Secondary classes will begin their annual series of ACT-battery assessments by the end of the month.  None of these are high stakes assessments, but will be used to adjust instructional targets for children. Standards-based instruction and assessment measured rigor are the the order of the day for the duration of remote education.

The real end goal when we transition from remote or hybrid education back to in-person learning is that all children will be ready for success in resuming a standards-based and rigorous education.   Make these two goals, standards-based instruction and rigorous learning expectations, your constant normal to assure children become “academically “lost” as a result of the pandemic.

The Era of Struggling Productively

Children forever hear slogans and sayings about the virtue of hard work and perseverance. These are just three.

“It’s hard to beat a person who never gives up.” Babe Ruth

“The three great essentials to achieve anything worthwhile are, first, hard work; second, stick-to-itiveness; third, common sense.” Thomas Edison

“There are no shortcuts to any place worth going.” Beverly Sills

Most of these, once we get past who is being quoted, serve as an aspirin to relieve the real-world anxiety and frustration children, and adults, feel when faced continuously with tasks that are difficult to complete successfully. School children today face an increasing array of difficult-to-complete tasks as educators are mandated to ramp up the pace and level of difficulty of rigorous academic content and skill sets.

The pace and level of difficulty of tasks laid before teachers is just as daunting as the challenges their students face. Everything about education is becoming more difficult. The issue for student and teacher alike is this – how can difficult problems be solved when there are no short cuts and hard work, perseverance and applications of common sense run thin?

“When the going gets tough, the tough get going,” doesn’t help and may only increase the angst.

Although it may sound like denying water to a person dying of thirst, best instructional practice is denying a learning child access to easy answers. Best practice reads like this.

• Provide children with difficult academic problems.

• Teach children the skills needed to solve similar problems. This step takes the most time and the most instructional diligence. Perseverance here pays dividends later.

• Point children to the resources needed to solve this type of problem. Part of problem solving is their experimentation with various resources not all of which will prove successful.

• Let children struggle with the application of their skills, their understanding of the academic context of a problem, and the solution to the problem at hand. Stand back and let them experiment. Ask only, “And, how did that work out?”

• Allow children to struggle productively, providing questions only, no answers, to help them progress through the problem solution. Good questions are more important than easy cues and clues.

• Debrief children after they have solved a problem. Talk just as much about what did not work as what did work. Debrief children on the struggle and what they learned from their persistence.

http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/coach_gs_teaching_tips/2015/02/do_more_for_students_by_doing_less_for_students.html?cmp=ENL-TU-NEWS2

Too often adults intervene, swooping in like rescuers, to relieve children of the hardship of struggle. We see parents putting themselves between their child and impending failure all the time. It seems easier to give a child the release from a problem than it is to explain to the child why you let them “suffer.” Weepy little eyes beg for intervention. Many adults and parents perceive the lack of immediate success as a failure and want to buffer a child from failure. This flies in the face of what we know about resilience training. Perseverance is not a trait that can be pulled out of a backpack on demand, used, and then returned to a backpack for another day. Perseverance is a consistent exercise of grittiness that a person applies to every aspect of life, not just school work. A child’s failure to build perseverance and grit may be more significant to adult success than their failure to develop good reading and comprehension or computation skills.

Additionally, “When something comes easy, you usually let it go the same way” – Nora Roberts. The speed of life is very fast for children and challenges that are solved easily are like commercials on TV, interruptions in the main story. Tough sledding is what they will think and talk about long after the lesson.

“Struggling productively” may well be how someone in a few years will label this era of complex and rigorous academic standards, performance-based assessments and educational accountability.