Teachers are a vast hodgepodge of people. They come in all colors, shapes and sizes, and from the wide spectrum of cultural and socio-economic backgrounds. At one point, each decided to be a teacher. Some early in life, the majority during their education, and others after experiencing other vocations. Each is the product of an educator preparation program. Each has earned a baccalaureate or more degrees and each carry one or more teaching licenses. As practitioners today, they range from first year teachers to four decade-long veterans. Teachers also range across the spectrum of effectiveness. That describes the hodgepodge of our profession.
Question?
If a teacher teaches a lesson and no one learns, did the teacher really teach? Though a play on Cartesian logic, it is a question that is asked everyday about teachers. We teach to cause children to learn.
Every day there are millions of lessons taught in our schools. A lesson is a complicated dance requiring teaching skills, teacher empathy, child readiness to learn, and child engagement with the teaching. Teachers know the dance steps but too often their teaching does not lead to learning. Some point to the other person(s) in the room – children. “Only if the children …” is their lament. Others point to the current morass of distractions confronting teaching and learning. Technology, social media, unstable home life, poverty, harassment from their peers – take your pick, they each bear guilt. On the Cartesian other hand, if a teacher teaches a lesson and every child learns, the teacher really did teach.
Not all teachers are created equal.
The following may be generalizations about teachers, but when you close your office or classroom door and consider your faculty peers, their names and faces fall into these.
We know teachers who have learned instruction as a form of mechanical teaching. They can construct lessons. They also know their curriculum. They can attach content knowledge and skill development to their instruction. They teach and some children learn some things sometimes. If these teachers were inspired and excited about learning and if they were “connected” to the children they taught, the results would be different. But they are not
We know teachers who innately care about children and in return children respond to them. Their classrooms are happy and exciting places. They teach and children engage because the teacher cares about them, their school life and their home life. Children hear and see and do and learn something sometimes. However, being happy and excited overpowers their constructive instruction. Class time is full of talk and activity and excitement, but their instruction is not focused and scaffolded to build learning outcomes. These teachers are liked by children, but these students will need reteaching next year of what they did not learn this year.
We know teachers who can deliver high quality instruction and innately care about children. They connect their caring of the child as a unique person to their instruction of the child as a student. Because the teacher cares about children, children care about their learning what the teacher teaches. These classrooms combine a caring and inspired teacher with honed and effective teaching skills with children who are wanting and ready to learn. Children learn.
The crux.
We can teach teachers pedagogy. We can teach teachers the content and skills of their curricular disciplines. We can purchase and provide all the curricular print and media, install and train teachers in the appropriate technologies, employ simulations and games in a rich educational environment. But we cannot teach teachers innate caring. The amorphous “teacher’s heart” is a variable we cannot grow.
On the positive side, we can train teachers to be responders to child needs. As trained teachers, they do wonders in assuring that children have the support and programs they need in school. Training is what moves children from hunger to being fed, unclothed to being clothed. Training helps them respond to students who are victims of bullying and harassment and low socio-emotional self-esteem. As trained teachers, they can implement their training, but training is not caring. There is a difference between caring that is from the heart and caring that is a trained response to need.
Our reality.
There is not a shortage of people who completed teacher preparation programs and are licensed to teach. There is a shortage of licensed teachers who want to be in classrooms. We need to acknowledge the latter.
As another generalization, the low arc of teacher compensation over the first decade of employment and the low esteem the public has for public school teachers means that undergraduates in the top half of their graduating class do not choose education as a degree program. Engineering, medicine, law, and business draw the top half of each graduating class.
The same reasons have diminished the annual numbers of graduates with a teaching license. In yesteryear, a district posting a teaching vacancy could expect dozens to a hundred applications. Today districts are lucky to receive five applications, and some postings result in zero applicants.
The shortage issue has caused state government to open apprenticeship pathways to a teaching license. People without teaching licenses are hired by school districts on the condition that this person enrolls in a teacher preparation program. Concurrently, these unlicensed teachers teach and learn how to teach. Understand clearly that school boards are happy to have a teacher of any dimension in the classroom even as they acknowledge apprentice teachers are not yet trained teachers.
This introduces a new category to our generalizations about teachers.
- The inspired, caring, highly effective teacher who causes successful student learning and growth.
- The caring teacher who engages children socially and emotionally and causes some children to learn some things sometimes.
- The technically-efficiently but emotionally vague teacher who constructs lessons and causes some children to learn something sometimes.
- The apprentice teacher who is learning how to teach on the job.
The Big Duh!
We need to know our teachers and their widely differentiated qualities and understand what we settle for when we place every teacher in a classroom. Children know the difference, so should we.